Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

USA A Couple of American Mansions

Recommended Posts

This is my penultimate thread from my latest trip to America!


On the same hot muggy day we discovered the incredible drive-in theater and I nearly met my demise in the hotel resort we were on a then-fruitless search for delicious ice cream refreshments on the way home and after being very disappointed to find a shop that said it was open on Google closed I had a lightbulb moment in my head and suddenly realised the town we had ended up in by accident was the home of a very large, very decrepit historic mansion. The mention of that perked up my friends who naturally said we should take a look even though it was late in the day and time was cracking on. We turned the corner and there it was, standing majestically and defiantly in an imposing position on the edge of a lake. This was the White Lake Mansion House, built in 1848 and at one time a high class Jewish holiday hotel now, sadly, a stripped out hollow shell following a failed conversion into apartments. Now the town wants to tear it down, because screw history am I right.


Photos taken handheld on an incredibly quick ten minute run around.




















Another historic building which may happily meet a better fate if the recent news reports are to be believed (more on that later) is this huge former Masonic Home. It has laid derelict and decaying for over thirty years, the insides are a complete death trap and it really is such a shame as the building is incredible. When driving past we noticed a few cars parked out front and a couple of people, nothing unusual at that as the old grounds are designated a park of sorts. So we parked up and made our way in from the rear and found our entrance point conscious of the fact there were persons unknown at the front.


Having already had one adventure through a floor a couple of days before I was being very cautious as a lot of the floors in here are extremely dodgy - the roof was completely wrecked long ago and currently half has been replaced in preparation for a full blown restoration in the future. The floors in/around the chapel area were some of the worst I have personally ever walked across, the pews are sinking through the floor into the basement and there is no safe way through the chapel itself any more. Upstairs the damage is even worse with ceilings caved in, internal walls collapsed and all manner of other damage. We had a quick tentative run-around as we only stopped by on the off chance it was accessible on our way to a much larger location, I took a few photos of the highlights and we were gone. We walked around the front of the building and waved to the two slightly bemused looking guys, who it turns out were filming a local news report about the efforts to save the place.






















So two different mansions probably facing two very different fates. It's stories like the first that make me glad I live in a country that has some kind of legal protection afforded to old and important buildings.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the first shot! Always nice to see some American Houses. 
Nice stairs you got there!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By eyevolve

      Built in 1896 and in continuous use until 1995, this pinwheel style quaker prison was a reflection of a similar one located nearby. You can tour that one for a few dollars and take as many pictures as you like. This one was not so easy....

      It was the site of a controversial decades-long dermatological, pharmaceutical, and biochemical weapons research projects involving testing on inmates.

      The prison is also notable for several major riots in the early 1970s.

      The prison was home to several trials which raised several ethical and moral questions pertaining to the extent to which humans can be experimented on. In many cases, inmates chose to undergo several inhumane trials for the sake of small monetary reward. The prison was viewed as a human laboratory.
      “All I saw before me were acres of skin. It was like a farmer seeing a fertile field for the first time.” Dr. X

      One inmate described experiments involving exposure to microwave radiation, sulfuric and carbonic acid, solutions which corroded and reduced forearm epidermis to a leather-like substance, and acids which blistered skin in the testicular areas.

      In addition to exposure to harmful chemical agents, patients were asked to physically exert themselves and were immediately put under the knife to remove sweat glands for examination. In more gruesome accounts, fragments of cadavers were stitched into the backs of inmates to determine if the fragments could grow back into functional organs.

      So common was the experimentation that in the 1,200-person prison facility, around 80% to 90% of inmates could be seen experimented on.

      The rise of testing harmful substances on human subjects first became popularized in the United States when President Woodrow Wilson allowed the Chemical Warfare Service (CAWS) during World War I.

      All inmates who were tested upon in the trials had consented to the experimentation, however, they mostly agreed for incentives like monetary compensation. Experiments in the prison often paid around $30 to $50 and even as much as $800. “I was in prison with a low bail. I couldn’t afford the monies to pay for bail. I knew that I wasn’t guilty of what I was being held for. I was being coerced to plea bargain. So, I thought, if I can get out of this, get me enough money to get a lawyer, I can beat this. That was my first thought.”

      I expected to find an epic medical ward only to be filled with disappointment. The practice was so common I can only assume it was conducted everywhere.

      Many advocates of the prison trials, such as Solomon McBride, who was an administrator of the prisons, remained convinced that there was nothing wrong with the experimentation at the Holmesburg prison. McBride argued that the experiments were nothing more than strapping patches of cloth with lotion or cosmetics onto the backs of patients and argued this was a means for prisoners to earn an easy income.

      The negative public opinion was particularly heightened by the 1973 Congressional Hearing on Human Experimentation. The hearing was supposed to discuss the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and clarify the ethical and legal implications of human experimental research. This climate called for a conscious public which rallied against the use of vulnerable populations such as prisoners as guinea pigs. Companies and organizations who associated themselves with human testing faced severe backlash. Amidst the numerous senate hearings, public relation nightmares, and opponents to penal experimentation, county prison boards realized human experimentation was no longer acceptable to the American public. Swiftly, human testing on prisoners was phased out of the United States.

      Only a renovated gymnasium is considered suitable for holding inmates. That building is frequently used for overflow from other city jails.

      The district attorney launched an extensive two year investigation documenting hundreds of cases of the rape of inmates.

      The United States had ironically been strong enforcers of the Nuremberg Code and yet had not followed the convention until the 1990s. The Nuremberg code states: “[T]he person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”

      The prison trials violated this definition of informed consent because inmates did not know the nature of materials they were experimented with and only consented due to the monetary reward. America’s shutting down of prison experimentation such as those in the prison signified the compliance of the Nuremberg Code of 1947.

      You look so precious.

    • By Rob Adventures
      Located In Columbus Ohio. Very popular urbex place.
    • By eyevolve
      lil place in my backyard...
      i've been coming to this spot for over a decade. tragically i've only picked up a camera a few years back. it's nice to be able to visit a location many times in the continuation of self improvement and documenting the destruction of a location. heres a few shots from over the past year:

      pano from last summer. i ran here one day as the sun set. i wanted to catch the lighting.

      belly of the boiler.

      behind the controls. another scrapper hard at work i see.

      test shop.

      looking down

      the next year would be sad times as kids from all over began to populate this place. i used to be able to walk around for weeks without running into a soul, and now there could be 30 kids here. 

      in a short period of time shity taggers would desicrate the temple. angering the gods.

      even the snow doesnt cover that grime.

      she sure is a beauty tho. i've been to quite a few generating stations and none compare

      it felt like a train station grande hall. standing in the freezing cold taking a pic of snow falling (or ceiling)

      so ladylike

      everyones favorite hallway which was in a movie for 3 seconds. (relax-its photoshopped.....or is it???)

      until next time . . .